Purpose: To situate the Dred and Harriet Scott case in broader Minnesota and US historical context.
1. Learning Goals:
Student will navigate to multiple historical websites.
Student will take effective notes on multiple sources.
Student will identify one theme across three historical sources related to Dred or Harriet Scott.
Student will analyze the historical importance of that theme for understanding Minnesota history.
Student will learn to synthesize information from mutliple sources.
2. Review Background Information
Please review two background sources.
Take notes on the sources. What do you see that is different from today? What changes do you see? What stays the same. Your notes will be part of you final grade.
Using “Control + F” find al the references to Ft. Snelling. After reading the references, in your notes, describe what the court case reveals about Minnesota and the Scott’s time here.
You do not need to read the entire court case.
8. Search for “Slave sues for freedom” in the Race and Slavery Petitions Project for
What is the Conventions response to the Dred Scott case?
10. Type up you notes, answering the questions in the above assignment.
In one paragraph of 4–7 sentences, what theme would you argue connects these sources, aside from the obvious theme of the Scotts and slavery? Here’s a model.
In reviewing the sources for this week’s assignment, I noted the theme X came up several times. For example, in the source “Proceedings of a Convention of the Colored Men of Ohio” they mentioned “a.” As well, I noted in the picture of Ft. Snelling that “a” was present. These two relate to the actual court case as “a” was referenced in relation to “b.” I found the theme “a” to be historically significant because… .
Grading Criteria
Student took effective notes on all sources.
Student identified one theme across three historical sources related to Dred or Harriet Scott.
Student effectively analyzed the historical importance of that theme for understanding Minnesota history. (this is the most important grading criteria)
Student demonstrated synthesis of information from mutliple sources.